Skip to content
For technical reasons, this site had to be rebuilt from scratch. Some of its functionality and previous pages have been lost and it is possible that some links have been broken.

5 Things to Know About the Global Land Rush and How to Stop It

Salena Tramel, 16/04/2024

A recent gathering in Colombia, organized by the Land Deal Politics Initiative, was an important moment to assess the current state of play and ready strategies to face the current and impending onslaught of land grabs.

More than a decade ago, the Land Deals Politics Initiative (LDPI) was launched as a loose network of scholars and activists concerned about the rise of land, water and green grabs across the world and the consequences for rural livelihoods and agrarian relations.

If one thing is clear coming out of the International Conference on Global Land Grabbing last month in Bogotá, it is that the land rush is here to stay—and it's gaining momentum. The concept of land rush serves as an umbrella for the multidimensional land grabs that occur at different scales. It helps us grasp chaotic and insurgent moments—such as the one now underway—which are pushed forward by multiple actors and often involve violence.

The gathering in Colombia, organized by the Land Deal Politics Initiative, was an important moment to assess the current state of play and ready strategies to face the current and impending onslaught of land grabs. It was a cutting edge convergence of frontline social movement leaders, unapologetically progressive researchers, and policymakers with backgrounds in grassroots organizing—all dedicated to land politics and representing 69 countries.

The land rushes that are reproduced to sustain capitalism are held up by intersecting levers of oppression, among them class fragmentation and socially constructed identity politics like race and gender.

These efforts come at a critical time, when the media's spotlight on land grabbing has dimmed—signaling that the practice has become a routine part of international politics. The following are five key takeaways from the meeting in Colombia about the state of the land rush and the resistance that seeks to stop it in its tracks.

1. The Old Guard Marches On

Grabbing land, natural resources, and territory has always been an integral part of capitalism. The system thrives on crises—the more, the more profitable—which in turn provoke waves of uneven development. Contemporary land grabs are a layering of these factors, all of which are extractive in nature. When the 2008 food price crisis became ensnarled with global disruptions in finance and energy, it reconfigured large-scale land grabs as the world has come to know them.

Although agribusiness has been a defining feature of decades of neoliberal reforms, it has proliferated even more across the global South in recent years—turning peasant farms and Indigenous forests into monocrop business ventures. A striking case is that of Tanzania, one of the most heavily targeted countries for land grabs 15 years ago. Now it is bracing for a new surge of land deals for mass export crops, made worse by the oppressive seed policies that have been imposed throughout the African continent. These older land deals are on the map to stay, and the situation is further complicated by their newer counterparts.

2. Climate Politics Signify the Perfect Storm

Green and blue grabs—the idea of "selling nature to save it"—masquerade as a solution to the climate crisis and have resulted in an advanced surge of extraction, commodification, and financialization of nature. Such initiatives have brought new actors to the scene of the extractive economy, some of whom initially opposed it, in a vastly complicated alliance.

Cambodia, for instance, was the first country in Southeast Asia to endorse the Blue Skies & Net Zero 2050 campaign, which is one of the latest developments in carbon trading—earlier versions of which have devastated rural communities through massive land, water, and forest grabs. International financial and intergovernmental institutions continue to blame farmers, fishers, and forest dwellers for worsening climate change through "backwards" techniques—when the real culprit is violent foreign intervention coupled with decades of natural resource grabs led by agribusiness. Instead of attacking this problem at its root, programs like Net Zero make promises to resolve hunger, unemployment, and the climate crisis at once. The devil, however, is in the details—in this case shouldering local Cambodian peasants with the burden of mitigating big corporate pollution from abroad, unavoidably leading to more land grabs.

3. Resurging Violent Conflicts and Geopolitics

Land, water, and food have long been weaponized against marginalized populations through extreme violence. While our understanding of contemporary land grabs has often been one of transactionary land deals, usually large in scale, and often synonymous with agribusiness, we have yet to fully incorporate land seizures carried out through military invasions and wars into the equation. We must expand our conceptualization of the land rush to more comprehensively include these factors, also paying attention to the geopolitical environments in which they unfold.

An important link here is that for many peasant and Indigenous populations, land is not only a resource, but also territory. Seeing land grabbing as territory grabbing is a way of coming to terms with how land capture in violent conflict is an abduction of people, movements, culture, and history. As such, it has resounding place-specific and collective implications. Today genocide and ecocide in Gaza as a result of the Israeli invasion have refocused global attention on the question of Palestine. Analyzing these actions as territory grabs may contribute to a more just resolution of violent conflict—not only in Palestine, but also in other militarized geopolitical contexts as diverse as Haiti, Sudan, Myanmar, and Ukraine.

4. Colonization Is Alive and Well

The land rushes that are reproduced to sustain capitalism are held up by intersecting levers of oppression, among them class fragmentation and socially constructed identity politics like race and gender. These forced divisions are the driving force behind past and present colonial projects. Across the Americas, the plantation economy was made possible by the enslaved labor of Black bodies, the removal of Indigenous ones, and the cheapening of female and gender nonconforming ones. Struggles for independence and liberation from these processes have only partially been won, which is illustrated by modern land grabbing as an extension of plantation economies.

Land grabbing feeds on race, class, and gender as overlapping forms of oppression—and as such affects the Global North in addition to the Global South. In the highly racialized context of the United States, agribusiness continues to operate on lands stolen from Indigenous peoples with the labor of undocumented migrants—many of them displaced by extractive activities led by the United States in countries south of its Mexican border.

5. Peasant and Indigenous Movements Lead the Resistance

If anyone knows the true value of land, it is the peasant and Indigenous communities that have ensured its survival across borders and generations. These groups of people are consistently hunted alongside the natural resources they seek to protect. Their demands—for ending and rolling back land grabs—are most often disregarded as idealistic at best and downright undoable at worst.

But against all odds, and frequently faced with great danger, social movements are winning struggles for territory. This work occurs in sophisticated alliances that straddle local, national, and international organizing efforts. Colombia was selected as the host country for the gathering against land grabbing precisely for these reasons, with hopes that bearing witness to the history being written there could inspire political gains elsewhere. From its Pacific and Caribbean coastlines, to its vast farmlands that fade into the Amazonian and Andean forests, rural communities are taking back territory—under the protection of an amenable government that is committed to an ongoing process of putting into place peasant and Indigenous autonomous zones.

Social movements are building strong convergences with politically aligned scholars and policymakers to prepare for the next phases of their still-uphill battle against the land rush—not only in Colombia, but around the world.

 

Sources and references

Source: «5 Things to Know About the Global Land Rush and How to Stop It», in Common Dreams, 11-04-2024.

Saturnino M. Borras Jr. & Jennifer C. Franco, Land rush, 1-03-2024.

Arnim Scheidel, «Forest plantations and climate change discourses: New powers of ‘green’ grabbing in Cambodia», in Land Use Policy, vol. 77, pp. 9-18, setembro-2018, Courtney Work (International Institute of Social Studies, Holanda).

Itayosara Rojas Herrera, Land is Life, Land is Hope, Land is Peace: The History of the Resettlement of Peace Signatories in Caquetá, Colombia, in Land & Life Stories Series # 2, maio-2023.

Wendy W. Wolford, Ben White, Ian Scoones, Ruth Hall, Marc Edelman and Saturnino M. Borras Jr, Global land deals: What has been done, what has changed, and what’s next?, janeiro-2024.

GRAIN and La Via Campesina Southern and Eastern Africa, A new wave of land grabs strikes Tanzania, 2-02-2024.

Lorenza Arango, Spectacularization and the contemporary land rush in the Colombian Altillanura, março-2024.

Annelies Zoomers and Kei Otsuki, Rushing for Land in the Context of Climate Change: Seven theses about why climate justice requires radical changes in land governance, março-2024.

Markus Kröger and Adriana Margutti, Land Title Frauds as Corporate Land-grabbing Methods: Evidence from Brazil, março-2024.

Frew Yirgalem Mane, Land, Party/State-led Development and Protest in Ethiopia.

Sérgio Sauer, Eco-Agrarian Question: Land and green grabbing in the Brazilian agricultural frontier.

Julio Gutiérrez, Spectacular Dispossession: Land Grabbing, Far-Right Urbanism and the Economy of Appearances in El Salvador’s “Bitcoin City”.

Loveness Msofi and Masautso Chimombo, Land Pawning as Land Grabbing: A Focus on Rural Malawi.

Doi Ra, Dispossession and political struggles in ‘failed’ land investments.

Diana Aguiar and Mauricio Correia, Digital green grabs in the name of climate in Brazil’s Matopiba frontier.

Faustina Obeng Adomaa, Gertrude Dzifa Torvikey, and Adwoa Yeboah Gyapong, Whose salt? Unravelling the role of state policy regimes in resource grabbing in Ghana.

Salena Tramel, Territory grabbing and the undermining of Palestinian food sovereignty.

Sergio Carvajal, REDD+ and the Climate rent: The reorganization of value relations through forest conservation in Colombia.

Amod Shah, Unpacking incremental land grabbing: Anti-coal struggles and the political economy of coal extraction in India.

Andreas Neef, Navigating the Murky Waters of Resource Exploitation: A Global Review of Marine Grabbing and Freshwater Grabbing.

Bruno Rezende Spadotto, Horizontalities and verticalities in Matopiba (Brazil): reactions from below to global corporate agribusiness land grabbing.

Jeremy Bourgoin, Roberto Interdonato, Marie Gradeler, Ward Anseeuw, Fostering Accountability: Acknowledging Transnational Challenges in Land Investments for Informed Action.

Benjamin Muhoza Kanze, The dynamics of public land privatization in urban DRC: A case study of Bukavu in eastern DRC.

Angus Lyall & Gabriela Ruales, Double-Binds in Land Grab Contexts: The Case of Peasant Miners in Napo, Ecuador.

Shivalika Madgulkar & Jampel Dell’Angelo, Who acquires land and how does it matter? Unveiling the dynamics of domestic land acquisition.

Julián Andrés Rivera Delgado and Sergio Latorre Restrepo, Acaparamiento y Restitución de Tierras: Lecciones de los procesos de restitución en los Montes de María-Colombia.

Natacha Bruna, The Carbon Rush: Expropriation of Emission Rights and Socio-Environmental (In)Justice.

Anja Nygren & Angela Viviana Rabelo Avalos, Oil extraction and indirect land grabbing: Responsibility and resistance in Southern sacrifice zones.

Alex Heffron, Trees devouring sheep: Land grabbing investment funds and the ‘new enclosures’ of Welsh farmland.

Gabe Schwartzman and John Gaventa, Power and Financialization: Soft Power and the Rise of Corporate Conservation in an Appalachian Valley.

Rutgerd Boelens et. al., Traveling Rivers, Mapping Movements: The politics of counter-mapping to bridge grassroots struggles against river grabbing.

Juan Diego Ayala, The older land grabs: ‘invisible’ and non-operational land deals within the State territorialization and frontier production in the Argentinian Chaco.

Paolo D’Odorico, Jampel Dell’Angelo, Maria Cristina Rulli, Hydrological and institutional mechanisms of water grabbing.

Frances Thomson, State-backed land dispossession: The role of property rights violations and restrictions in capitalist market economies.

Rassela Malinda, Dispossession, extractive capitalism and political reactions from below in West Papua.

Sammy Andrea Sánchez Garavito, Differentiated impacts of green grabbing in social reproduction: the case of la Sierra de la Macarena National Park.

Felix Mantz, Land Grabbing through Unlivability: Necroscapes and Slow Violence in the Expansion of Conservation Regimes in Tanzania.

Estevan Coca, Land and water rush in the South of Minas Gerais’ corporate coffee production.

Natacha Bruna, Saturnino M. Borras Jr. and Yunan Xu, Failed land deals and the invisibilization of land grabbing in Mozambique.

Catalina Quiroga, Mangroves in the Colombian Caribbean: A story of the inclusion of water and land ecosystems in biodiversity and climate change public policies.

Margarita Martínez-Osorio, Reading the Archive Against the Grain: Peasant Women and Children in the Struggle for Land and Livelihoods in the Colombian Caribbean during the 1960s.

Moges Belay, Land Deals Outside the Spotlight and the Land Rush in Ethiopia.

Daniela P. G. Calmon, From little ants to monster-slayers: metaphors used by corporations and transnational activist networks in land and climate conflicts.

Mark Tilzey, Dependency, Imperialism, and the Super-Exploitation of Labour-Power and Nature in the Global South.

Katherine Aske, Land as a “means to an end”? Grain farmers, land imaginaries and assetization in Alberta, Canada.

Ali-Ibrahim Mustafa Mohammed, Land Grabbing and its Implications for Pastoral Nomads’ Lands and Livelihoods. Blue Nile State, Sudan (1970-2023).

Joachim S. Stassart, Flávia M. de A. Collaço, Dário Cardoso Jr., Richard Torsiano, & Renato Morgado, Hijacking land tenure: how individual corrupt conduct and policy capture are enabling land grabs in Brazil.

Saturnino M. Borras Jr., Lorenza Arango, Moges Belay, Jennifer C. Franco, Sai Sam Kham, Tsegaye Moreda, Doi Ra, Itayosara Rojas, Chunyu Wang, Jingzhong Ye & Yunan Xu, Death of agrarian societies by a thousand cuts: ‘Pin prick’ land grabs and the land rush.

Enrique Castañón Ballivián, George Tonderai Mudimu, Mnqobi Ngubane & Melanie Sommerville, «Capital grabs back»: Agrarian counter-reform dynamics in the global South and North.

Andrés Caicedo & Ingrid Díaz Moreno, Oil Palm, Affects, Dreams: Everyday Forms of Dispossession in Colombia.

Angela Serrano Zapata & M. Sofía Luna-Siachoque, Unpaid Women’s Labor Driving Value Chain Disintegration in the Colombian Palm Oil Industry.

Bosman Batubara, Kei Otsuki, Femke van Noorloos, & Michelle Kooy, Extracting but not producing value: Land development through everyday speculation of rent in Indonesia’s new capital city.

Alessandra Manzini, Lamine Sadio, Luc Descroix, Peasant resistances value for global sustainability: three failed coastal grabs of metal mining projects in West Africa.

Thuy Ho and Annie Shattuck, Contract Farming and Environmental Precarity in the Mekong Delta.

Itayosara Rojas Herrera, Variations of Extra-Economic Coercion in the Global Land Rush: The Case of Oil Palm Expansion in the Orinoco-Amazon Corridor.

J. Sebastian Reyes-Bejarano, Crisis, Ecological Conflicts, and the River Fix.

Chiara Chiavaroli and Irene Vélez-Torres, Coca entanglements: cocalero women between gendered resistance and everyday dispossession.

Quentin Grislain, Perrine Burnod, Jeremy Bourgoin, and Ward Anseeuw, Producing and sharing data on large-scale land acquisitions: challenges and lessons learned from land observatories.

Alistair Fraser, Scrutinizing the digitalization of food and agricultural systems: The EU’s agrarian project and its local and offshore impacts.

Clemente Ntauazi and Boaventura Monjane, From ‘Silent Privatization’' to Policy-Supported (Re)concentration: Historicizing the Dynamics of Land Concentration in Mozambique.

Yukari Sekine, Ecological imperialism and struggles over the state: historical trajectories behind contemporary authoritarianism in Burma/Myanmar.

Jampel Dell’Angelo Paolo D’Odorico, and Maria Cristina Rulli, Water Commons Grabbing: a heuristic framework.

Jaime Osorno, El rol de la Sociedad de Activos Especiales en las políticas de Reforma Agraria en Colombia.

Hammal Muhammad Aslam and Haroon Ishaque, Urbanization and Peri-Urban land grabbing in Karachi.

Soledad Castro-Vargas & Marion Werner, After the banana enclave: plantation legacies and the chemicalization of agriculture in Costa Rica.

 
themes: açambarcamento de terras, agronegócio, colonialismo

visits (all languages): 7
 

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website